5/30/2023 0 Comments Airbridge travel inc![]() I would keep the China travel ban until China reciprocates for American travelers *and* proves that their epidemiological data can be trusted by allowing a team of U.S. I also think travel should be restored with Brazil, because their epidemiological situation has also improved quite a bit and they have invited American travelers back. Epidemiological conditions are converging between the two regions right now as conditions improve in the U.S. ![]() I wouldn’t even require tests, just temperature checks and maybe a health form upon arrival. FIC Airbridge Info, Stanley, Falkland Islands. I agree with Matthew that U.S./EU/UK travel should be restored immediately. Are passport control officers going to examine leases? Bank statements? Absurd. The problem is that, unlike in European countries, Americans and Brits don’t have ID cards or residential address registration, so proving one’s residency in a place is extremely hard, especially in two cities where most people don’t drive and therefore don’t require driver’s licenses. But this “air bridge” would mark progress and reward the good work New York and London have done (after screwing up so badly to start).ĭo you see any pitfalls to a transatlantic air bridge between New York City and London? should fully re-open travel corridors to the United Kingdom and the European Union immediately. □ CONCLUSIONĮxpect outrage over cultural elitism and similar charges, as the plan would definitely not be open to all UK and US citizens. Rules can provide the most efficient way to proceed, saving time and effort while simultaneously lessening the risk of error in a particular case.Īnyway, I guess I’m just upset that Los Angeles residents appear to be left out. Unit 22, Legaspi Suites, 178 Salcedo St., Legaspi Village, Makati City, Philippines. For more information, you may call or visit our Office: AIRBRIDGE TRAVEL INC. An analogy would be why are pilots forced to retire at 65 years old when many are healthy, strong, and fit to fly for many more years? The answer is because generally applicable rules provide more predictable outcomes. Pearl Harbor Day Tour Guided tour of ‘Iolani Palace - the only royal palace on US Soil. ![]() I suppose the counterpoint would be that New York City and London, as cities, are much safer travel destinations, statically at least, than other COVID-19 hotspots. If that is the case, why not just allow anyone with a negative PCR test to visit? Just because certain enclaves of the country are faring far worse than others, isn’t the point to keep virus out…not people who don’t have the virus? I’m going to assume, though it isn’t mentioned, that such travel will still require a recent negative PCR test and perhaps another test upon arrival. They are at a very early stage but it is vital to get business going with a major trading partner especially as we near Brexit.” Why Not Just Require Negative PCR Testing? ![]() “There are discussions going on at a very senior level around opening up London and New York. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |